2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2010 Ford F-350
To start off, 2010 Ford F-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-350 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-350 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2010 Ford F-350 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Ford |
| Model | I-280 | F-350 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 5400 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 495 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 3490 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 144 L |
