2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2010 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2010 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saab 03-Sep (207 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Saab 03-Sep (299 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2010 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Isuzu | Saab |
| Model | I-280 | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2000 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 299 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4646 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2675 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 62 L |
