2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2010 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2010 Toyota Sienna is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Sienna (266 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Sienna (332 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Sienna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2010 Toyota Sienna | |
| Make | Isuzu | Toyota |
| Model | I-280 | Sienna |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3500 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 266 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 332 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 5105 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1966 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 76 L |
