2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. At 2,801 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer (237 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu I-280 weights approximately 440 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Isuzu I-280. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer (343 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Isuzu | Mitsubishi |
Model | I-280 | Lancer |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 2000 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 343 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4572 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1491 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 55 L |