2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu I-280 weights approximately 815 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Isuzu I-280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mini |
| Model | I-280 | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3728 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1384 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 50 L |
