2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C30 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo C30 (320 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
Model | I-280 | C30 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2500 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4266 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2039 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1447 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |