2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2013 Volvo S80
To start off, 2013 Volvo S80 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S80 (296 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S80 (441 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2013 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
| Model | I-280 | S80 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4851 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1861 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1493 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2835 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
