2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 1963 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Minx.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Isuzu Minx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-350 | 1963 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Isuzu | Isuzu |
Model | I-350 | Minx |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 1491 cc |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 40 L |