2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-350 | 1973 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | I-350 | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1590 mm |
