2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 1980 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Seat Ritmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat Ritmo. 2006 Isuzu I-350 has automatic transmission and 1980 Seat Ritmo has manual transmission. 1980 Seat Ritmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Isuzu I-350 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-350 | 1980 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Isuzu | Seat |
Model | I-350 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 92 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |