2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 1999 Volvo C70
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1999 Volvo C70. (165 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 1999 Volvo C70.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Volvo C70. (220 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-350 | 1999 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
| Model | I-350 | C70 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3458 cc | 2435 cc |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 68 L |
