2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2002 Jaguar XK8
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XK8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XK8 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (300 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XK8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XK8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-350 | 2002 Jaguar XK8 | |
Make | Isuzu | Jaguar |
Model | I-350 | XK8 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 4195 cc |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 16.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 75 L |