2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (186 Nm). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6. 2006 Isuzu I-350 has automatic transmission and 2003 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2003 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Isuzu I-350 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-350 | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | I-350 | 6 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 186 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1790 mm |