2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (229 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Lincoln LS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lincoln LS. (298 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-350 | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Isuzu | Lincoln |
Model | I-350 | LS |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 2967 cc |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 68 L |