2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2004 Seat Toledo
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Seat Toledo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Seat Toledo would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2004 Seat Toledo. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 2004 Seat Toledo.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Seat Toledo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Seat Toledo. (250 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Seat Toledo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-350 | 2004 Seat Toledo | |
Make | Isuzu | Seat |
Model | I-350 | Toledo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 1896 cc |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 55 L |