2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2010 BMW 535
To start off, 2010 BMW 535 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-350 would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 535 (300 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 535 should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 535 (406 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 BMW 535 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-350 | 2010 BMW 535 | |
Make | Isuzu | BMW |
Model | I-350 | 535 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 3000 cc |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 406 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4856 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1847 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1491 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2885 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |