2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2010 Pontiac G6
To start off, 2010 Pontiac G6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-350 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Pontiac G6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Pontiac G6 (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Pontiac G6 should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Pontiac G6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Pontiac G6 (340 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Pontiac G6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-350 | 2010 Pontiac G6 | |
Make | Isuzu | Pontiac |
Model | I-350 | G6 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 3600 cc |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 61 L |