2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2010 Volkswagen CC
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen CC is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-350 would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2010 Volkswagen CC. (200 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 2010 Volkswagen CC.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Volkswagen CC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volkswagen CC. (280 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volkswagen CC.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-350 | 2010 Volkswagen CC | |
Make | Isuzu | Volkswagen |
Model | I-350 | CC |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 2000 cc |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4798 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1854 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |