2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-350 would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (242 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (340 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-350 | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
Make | Isuzu | Land Rover |
Model | I-350 | Range Rover Evoque |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 2000 cc |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1966 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1636 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2662 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |