2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2012 Renault Logan
To start off, 2012 Renault Logan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-350 would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2012 Renault Logan. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Logan.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Renault Logan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Logan. (160 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Logan.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-350 | 2012 Renault Logan | |
Make | Isuzu | Renault |
Model | I-350 | Logan |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 1459 cc |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 50 L |