2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-350 would be higher.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-350 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Isuzu | Cadillac |
Model | I-350 | CTS |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 302 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1842 mm |