2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2013 Mazda 6
To start off, 2013 Mazda 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-350 would be higher.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 6. (226 Nm). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 6. 2006 Isuzu I-350 has automatic transmission and 2013 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2013 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Isuzu I-350 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-350 | 2013 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | I-350 | 6 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1840 mm |
