2006 Isuzu KB vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,494 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu KB (197 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu KB should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu KB (281 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu KB | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Isuzu | Lotus |
| Model | KB | Elan |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1498 cc |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 138 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.4 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 72.7 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1150 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 45 L |
