2006 Isuzu KB vs. 1964 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 2,499 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu KB (78 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1964 Triumph Spitfire. (62 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu KB should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph Spitfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu KB (170 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph Spitfire. (91 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu KB | 1964 Triumph Spitfire | |
| Make | Isuzu | Triumph |
| Model | KB | Spitfire |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1147 cc |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 91 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 69.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2110 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 40 L |
