2006 Isuzu KB vs. 1977 Volvo 260
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 3,494 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu KB (197 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 260. (146 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu KB should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 260.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu KB (281 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 260. (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 260. 1977 Volvo 260 has automatic transmission and 2006 Isuzu KB has manual transmission. 2006 Isuzu KB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1977 Volvo 260 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu KB | 1977 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
Model | KB | 260 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2662 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.4 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 73 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1440 mm |