2006 Isuzu KB vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu KB (118 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu KB should accelerate faster than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu KB weights approximately 990 kg more than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu KB (174 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu KB | 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Isuzu | Mitsubishi |
Model | KB | Celeste |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1410 cc |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 174 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2350 mm |