2006 Isuzu KB vs. 1983 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Lincoln Continental (129 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (126 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu KB weights approximately 404 kg more than 1983 Lincoln Continental.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Lincoln Continental (310 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (204 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1983 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu KB | 1983 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Isuzu | Lincoln |
Model | KB | Continental |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 4940 cc |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2760 mm |