2006 Isuzu KB vs. 1990 Rover Metro
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Rover Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Rover Metro would be higher. At 3,494 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu KB (197 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1990 Rover Metro. (95 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu KB should accelerate faster than 1990 Rover Metro.
Because 2006 Isuzu KB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Isuzu KB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Rover Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu KB (281 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Rover Metro. (124 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Rover Metro.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu KB | 1990 Rover Metro | |
| Make | Isuzu | Rover |
| Model | KB | Metro |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1396 cc |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.4 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 79 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 35 L |
