2006 Isuzu KB vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XKA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XKA would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 269 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (197 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 562 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (281 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu KB | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
| Make | Isuzu | Jaguar |
| Model | KB | XKA |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 4399 cc |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 466 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 843 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
