2006 Isuzu KB vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,499 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (190 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (78 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Because 2006 Isuzu KB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Isuzu KB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (177 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (170 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu KB | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Isuzu | Toyota |
| Model | KB | Celica |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1799 cc |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 177 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 75 L |
