2006 Isuzu KB vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu KB (118 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu KB should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu KB weights approximately 1160 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu KB (175 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu KB | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Isuzu | MCC |
| Model | KB | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 599 cc |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 1810 mm |
