2006 Isuzu KB vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,499 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (78 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Because 2006 Isuzu KB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Isuzu KB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (170 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu KB | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | KB | 6 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 64 L |