2006 Isuzu KB vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (78 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (170 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu KB | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mitsubishi |
| Model | KB | Colt |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2972 cc |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2970 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 95 L |
