2006 Isuzu KB vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 2,405 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (126 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Because 2006 Isuzu KB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Isuzu KB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (204 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu KB | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Isuzu | Holden |
Model | KB | Epica |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 1991 cc |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 204 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |