2006 Isuzu KB vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 359 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (197 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V (746 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 465 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (281 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu KB | 2010 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Isuzu | Cadillac |
Model | KB | CTS-V |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 6200 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 556 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 746 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1455 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 68 L |