2006 Isuzu KB vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 218 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (126 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Because 2006 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (208 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB. 2010 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 2006 Isuzu KB has manual transmission. 2006 Isuzu KB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu KB | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Isuzu | Holden |
| Model | KB | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2405 cc | 6000 cc |
| Horse Power | 126 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 208 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
