2006 Isuzu KB vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi TT (360 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (78 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Because 2012 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Isuzu KB. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi TT (465 Nm @ 1650 RPM) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (170 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2012 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu KB | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | Isuzu | Audi |
Model | KB | TT |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2500 cc |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 360 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 465 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4199 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1349 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 60 L |