2006 Isuzu KB vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 3,494 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu KB (197 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2012 Ford C-Max. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu KB should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford C-Max.
Because 2006 Isuzu KB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Isuzu KB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford C-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu KB (281 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford C-Max. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu KB | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Isuzu | Ford |
| Model | KB | C-Max |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1596 cc |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1626 mm |
