2006 Isuzu KB vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 3,494 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (197 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (281 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2006 Isuzu KB has manual transmission. 2006 Isuzu KB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Isuzu KB 2013 Cadillac CTS
Make Isuzu Cadillac
Model KB CTS
Year Released 2006 2013
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3494 cc 3000 cc
Horse Power 197 HP 266 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 281 Nm 302 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 5700 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93.4 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85 mm 80 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4859 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1473 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 68 L