2006 Isuzu KB vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 6,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (445 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 367 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (78 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (601 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 431 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (170 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu KB | 2013 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Isuzu | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | KB | C |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 6300 cc |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 445 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 601 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 11.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4707 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1997 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1406 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2760 mm |