2006 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 2006 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar X-Type (193 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240.
Because 2006 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar X-Type (241 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 240. (127 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jaguar X-Type | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | X-Type | 240 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 241 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2660 mm |