2006 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 2006 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 294 kg more than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Because 2006 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Jaguar X-Type 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Jaguar Oldsmobile
Model X-Type Cutlass
Year Released 2006 1985
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2099 cc 2260 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 154 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1614 kg 1320 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4850 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2680 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]