2006 Jaguar X-Type vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 635 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 2006 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jaguar X-Type | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | X-Type | Clio |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 50 L |
