2006 Jaguar X-Type vs. 2004 Mazda RX-8

To start off, 2006 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2006 Jaguar X-Type. (154 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2006 Jaguar X-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 183 kg more than 2004 Mazda RX-8.

Because 2004 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar X-Type, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar X-Type (366 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda RX-8. (220 Nm). This means 2006 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda RX-8.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Jaguar X-Type 2004 Mazda RX-8
Make Jaguar Mazda
Model X-Type RX-8
Year Released 2006 2004
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2198 cc 2616 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 154 HP 189 HP
Torque 366 Nm 220 Nm
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1575 kg 1392 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4440 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 61 L