2006 Jaguar XJ vs. 1962 Maserati Tipo 64
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XJ is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2006 Jaguar XJ. (204 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 2006 Jaguar XJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1019 kg more than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 has manual transmission. 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jaguar XJ | 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Maserati |
| Model | XJ | Tipo 64 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 2722 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1659 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2210 mm |
