2006 Jaguar XJ vs. 1965 Renault 4
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XJ is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XJ (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 367 more horse power than 1965 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1009 kg more than 1965 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jaguar XJ | 1965 Renault 4 | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XJ | 4 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1659 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 60 L |