2006 Jaguar XJ vs. 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XJ is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XJ (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 549 kg more than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar XJ (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jaguar XJ | 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XJ | RX 4 Coupe |
Year Released | 2006 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1659 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2520 mm |