2006 Jaguar XJ vs. 1984 Renault 25
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XJ is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault 25 would be higher. At 2,722 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XJ (204 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1984 Renault 25. (122 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1984 Renault 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 459 kg more than 1984 Renault 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar XJ (436 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Renault 25. (193 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Renault 25.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jaguar XJ | 1984 Renault 25 | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XJ | 25 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2722 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 436 Nm | 193 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 89 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1659 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 34 L |