2006 Jaguar XJ vs. 1992 Acura Integra
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XJ is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Acura Integra would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1992 Acura Integra has manual transmission. 1992 Acura Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jaguar XJ | 1992 Acura Integra | |
Make | Jaguar | Acura |
Model | XJ | Integra |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2110 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2560 mm |