2006 Jaguar XJ vs. 1999 Suzuki C2
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XJ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XJ (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1999 Suzuki C2. (251 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1999 Suzuki C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 768 kg more than 1999 Suzuki C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar XJ (561 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki C2. (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jaguar XJ | 1999 Suzuki C2 | |
Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
Model | XJ | C2 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 561 Nm | 284 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 852 kg |